Cases 31 - 40 of 327
ABC v. DEF
as 1:2022cv07622
Plaintiff:
ABC
Defendant:
DEF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smart Study Co., LTD v. Acuteye-US
as 22-1810
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Smart Study Co., LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
HAPPY PARTY-001, SALIMHIB-US, GeGeonly and others
Defendant:
DEF, Tuoyi Toys, Topivot and others
Burberry Limited et al v. Various John Does et al
as 1:2022cv05286
Plaintiff:
ABC, Burberry Limited, Gianni Versace S.R.L. and others
Defendant:
DEF, Various John Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Trafelet v. Cipolla & Co. LLC.
as 1:2022cv04888
Plaintiff:
ABC
Petitioner:
Lara S. Trafelet
Defendant:
DEF
Respondent:
Cipolla & Co. LLC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Alexandre et al
as 1:2022cv03822
Plaintiff:
ABC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
DEF, Eddy Alexandre and Eminifx Inc.
Receiver:
David A Castleman
Interested Party:
Christopher Beil
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6 (b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
Conopco, Inc. v. 2026 Third Realty, LLC. et al
as 1:2022cv03480
Plaintiff:
ABC and Conopco Inc. doing business as Unilever
Defendant:
DEF, 2026 Third Realty, LLC., Hae Hee Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Iraq Telecom Limited v. IBL Bank S.A.L.
as 22-832
Plaintiff:
ABC
Petitioner:
Iraq Telecom Limited
Respondent:
IBL Bank S.A.L.
Defendant:
DEF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dean Shah et al
as 1:2022cv03012
Plaintiff:
ABC and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
DEF, Dean Shah, Henry Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
