Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Yepez v. 44 Court Street LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00758
Defendant:
44 Court Street LLC and Duane Reade, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julia Yepez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Wooten v. Duane Reade, Inc.
as 11-4274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James R. Wooten
Defendant - Appellee:
Duane Reade, Inc., Erik Ferencz and Javed Azmat
Mora v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04676
Plaintiff:
Ramon Mora
Defendant:
The City of New York , "John" Castro, John Does 1 and 2 and others
Cross_claimant:
Duane Reade, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cross_defendant:
Duane Reade, Inc. , Jane Doe , "John" Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Iqbal v. Duane Reade, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00933
Defendant:
Duane Reade, Inc. and Errol Smith
Plaintiff:
Hira Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00540
Names Presently Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
First Name Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Mani Jacob , Lesleena Mars , Ousmane Diop and others
Defendant:
Duane Reade, Inc. , Duane Reade Holdings, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
