Cases 31 - 40 of 6,481
Gibson v. Caban
as 24-1005
Plaintiff:
BENNIE GIBSON
Defendant:
HONORABLE JUDGES PRESIDING IN LITIGATION, EDWARD A. CABAN, The City Commissioner NYPD & Deputy Commissioner, KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE SUPERVISORS AND PROSECUTORS PROSECUTING INDICTMENT and others
Robinson et al v. Chisholm et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Karl Robinson and Niamh Bonus
Defendant:
Cheri Chisholm, Edward McCulloch and Patricia McCulloch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Knight v. City of New York
as 24-982
Plaintiff:
CAVALIER D. KNIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and EDWARD A. CABAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv02812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Youte v. Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority
as 24-953
Plaintiff:
GUY YOUTE
Defendant:
GREATER BRIDGEPORT TRANSIT AUTHORITY, EDWARD O'KEEFE, THOMAS GORMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
U.S. Bank National Association v. O'Hara et al
as 3:2024cv00657
Defendant:
Francis O'Hara, Francis G. O, Edward J. O'Hara and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
