Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Walwyn et al v. Sequoia Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02581
Plaintiff:
Joi Cipriano, Kelly Daniels, Barbara Ferraro and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Stacey Granat, Winthrop Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv09294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ferraro v. Bes Trucking Corp.
as 1:2015cv07379
Plaintiff:
Liliana Ferraro
Defendant:
Bes Trucking Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferraro v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05293
Plaintiff:
John Ferraro
Defendant:
Frank Peterson and Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Insys Therapeutics, Inc. v. Ferraro
as 7:2015cv03613
Plaintiff:
Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Ferraro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent et al v. State of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01533
Plaintiff:
James Carr, Karen Danish, Raymond Ferraro and others
Defendant:
Caroline W. Ahl, Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
R.L.E. Corp. v. Ferraro Foods, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
R.L.E. Corp.
Defendant:
Ferraro Foods, Inc. and Michael Rafte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08918
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Fritsche et al v. National Hockey League
as 1:2014cv05732
Plaintiff:
Dan Fritsche and Chris Ferraro
Defendant:
National Hockey League
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
