Cases 31 - 40 of 340
Holland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kristy Lynn Holland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03424
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Michael J. Renna, Sarah M. Barpoulis and others
Brining v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03384
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brining
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Joseph M. Rigby, Sarah M. Barpoulis and others
Kaufmann v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03255
Plaintiff:
David Kaufmann
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Sarah M. Barpoulis, Victor A. Fortkiewicz and others
Finger v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03226
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Sarah M. Barpoulis, Victor A. Fortkiewicz and others
Hopkins v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., James S. Metcalf, Rose Lee and others
Burrell v. Central New York Psychiatric Center et al
as 9:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Central New York Psychiatric Center, D. McIntosh, C. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stein v. Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02981
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc., James S. Metcalf, Rose Lee and others
Hopkins v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01972
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Joseph M. Rigby, Michael J. Renna and others
Stein v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02647
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Joseph M. Rigby, Sarah M. Barpoulis and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
