Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Guindon v. Connecticut Managed Health Care et al
as 3:2014cv00396
Plaintiff:
Brian Guindon
Defendant:
Connecticut Managed Health Care, Lawlor, Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, James E. Dzurenda, Peter J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2013cv01847
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Danne P. Malloy, Scott Erfe, Bate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalican v. Dzurenda
as 13-4011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kurtulus K. Kalican
Defendant - Appellee:
James E. Dzurenda, District Administrator, Lee, Warden, Adgers, Deputy Warden and others
Cote v. Hartford Corr Ctr et al
as 3:2013cv01158
Petitioner:
John Cote
Respondent:
James E. Dzurenda and Hartford Corr Ctr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Arnone et al
as 3:2013cv00971
Plaintiff:
Devon Smith
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, James E. Dzurenda, Mark Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo-Palencia v. Murphy et al
as 3:2013cv00920
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Carrillo-Palencia
Respondent:
Peter J. Murphy, James E. Dzurenda and Richard Colangelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Arnone et al
as 3:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Oscar L. Anderson
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, James E. Dzurenda, Brighthaupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Arnone et al
as 3:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Richard Reynolds
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone and James E. Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Medina
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Wright and Brighthaupt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
