Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 299
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06306
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03601
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03601
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv04856
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Heim v. Daniel
as 22-1135
Plaintiff / Appellant: John J. Heim
Defendant / Appellee: Betty Daniel, Adrian Masters, Havidan Rodriguez and others
Oriska Corporation v. Troy Operating Co. LLC
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Troy Operating Co. LLC, (Diamond) Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Blain v. State University of New York Downstate Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03022
Plaintiff: Stacy Blain
Defendant: State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Vitaly Citovsky, Richard Gronostajski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC, Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appearClass Defendant, Annette Hall, Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?