Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Clarke et al v. American Express Company et al
as 1:2012cv07496
Plaintiff:
Rosaleen Clarke , Ismael Albarado and Larry Don Smith
Defendant:
American Express Company, American Express Travel Related Services, Inc., American Express Centurion Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ross v. American Express Company
as 12-2303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Robert Ross, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Randal Wachsmuth, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
American Express Company, American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. and American Express Centurion Bank
Objector:
Kirk A. Kennedy
Objector - Appellant:
Victor A. Serafino
United States of America v. Saghafi et al
as 1:2011cv00754
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Elizabeth E. Saghafi, American Express Centurion Bank, FIA Card Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Simmons v. American Recovery Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv00811
Plaintiff:
Ellie J. Simmons
Defendant:
American Recovery Services, Inc. and American Express Centurion Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Claude v. American Express Centurion Bank
as 3:2010cv00742
Plaintiff:
Phenol Claude
Defendant:
American Express Centurion Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross et al v. American Express Company et al
as 1:2004cv05723
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross and Randal Wachsmuth
Defendant:
American Express Company , American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. and American Express Centurion Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Wright et al
as 1:2007cv04651
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Wright, 310 West 56th Street Corporation, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
