Cases 41 - 50 of 16,905
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pintado Loja v. Garland
as 24-1415
Petitioner:
MERCY JOHANNA PINTADO LOJA, DAMARIS VALENTINA LOJA PINTADO and MARIA DEL CISNE LOJA PINTADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Esseily v. Hochul
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
ALI ESSEILY
Defendant:
KATHY HOCHUL, in her capacity as governor, LETITIA JAMES, in her capacity as state attorney general, ERIC ADAMS, in his capacity as mayor and others
Xiao-Chao v. Garland
as 24-1408
Petitioner:
ZHUO XIAO-CHAO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1416
Petitioner:
GURPREET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. The City of New York
as 24-1388
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Former Mayor of New York City, ERIC GONZALEZ, Kings County District Attorney and others
Gonzalez v. New York City Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv04089
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gonzalez
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Corrections, Correctional Officer John June, Correctional Officer John Randazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
