Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 487
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Petitioner: Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04509
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv11129
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04563
Plaintiff: The City of Philadelphia
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
SL-X Trading Europe Limited v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2699
Plaintiff / Appellant: SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05347
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?