Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Cedeno et al v. Broan-Nutone, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00796
Defendant:
Broan-Nutone, LLC, Lowe's Companies, Inc., Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Judith Cedeno and Louis Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cedeno et al v. Montauk Student Transport LLC et al
as 1:2015cv07746
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cedeno and Julio C. Dotel-Perez
Defendant:
Montauk Student Transport LLC and John B. Mensch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Luna et al v. Benny's Burritos, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06479
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Luna, Miguel Luis Yat Chic, Sinuhe Flores Munoz and others
Defendant:
Benny's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Benny's Burritos, Blockhead's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Blockheads, Egg White, Inc. doing business as Blockheads and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tam et al v. Star Nissan, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04363
Defendant:
Osiris Cedeno, Paul Chong, John Doe Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Lei Guo and Robert Tam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cedeno v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00993
Plaintiff:
Leeann Cedeno
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cedeno v. USA
as 6:2015cv06018
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nancy Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cedeno v. Racette
as 1:2014cv06666
Petitioner:
Luis Cedeno
Respondent:
Steven Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Thompson
as 14-3156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Germaine Garcia
Defendant - Appellee:
D.A. Kenneth P. Thompson, Eric T. Schneiderman, Charles J. Hynes and others
Rodriguez v. Holder
as 14-1262
Petitioner:
Frank Rodriguez, AKA Frank Rodrhuez-Cedeno
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
