Cases 41 - 50 of 152
Meyers v. Port Authority of Trans Hudson (PATH) et al
as 1:2020cv09645
Plaintiff:
Rachel Meyers
Defendant:
Arthur Blakey, Carlos Proano, The Brotherhood of Locomotives, Engineers, and Trainmen (BLET) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PALACE SKATEBOARDS GROUP, et al v. ADMZING STORE, et al
as 1:2020cv06103
Plaintiff:
ABC, Palace Skateboards Group and GSLT Holdings Limited
Defendant:
DEF, GUANGZHOU MICHUANSHI DRESS CO. LTD., GKSKY LUXURYBRANDCASE4 STORE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Sajnani et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04281
Plaintiff:
Jean Mak and Andy Sajnani
Defendant:
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
In Re The Hain Celestial Group
as 20-1517
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rosewood Funeral Home and Salamon Gimpel
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lynn, James Spadola and Bradley D. Flora, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephen J. Smith, Irwin D. Simon, John Carroll and others
Coperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch et al v. EisnerAmper LLP
as 1:2020cv04071
Defendant:
Eisneramper LLP
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi International Corporation, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., Athilon Capital Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Keane et al v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2006cv00149
Plaintiff:
Richard Keane, Karen Haines, Sandra Jeffreys and others
Defendant:
Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Aland (Jiangsu) Nutraceutical Co., Ltd, Northeast Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Hain Capital Investors Master Fund Ltd. v. Rio Sul S.A. de C.V.
as 1:2020cv02090
Defendant:
Rio Sul S.A. de C.V.
Plaintiff:
Hain Capital Investors Master Fund Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294
Kyszenia v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00979
Plaintiff:
Janet Kyszenia
Defendant:
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch et al v. Crowe LLP
as 1:2020cv01556
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi International Corporation, Woodforest National Bank, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and others
Defendant:
Crowe LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Whitnum v. Emons
as 19-1789
Defendant / Appellee:
Margaret Gerundo-Murkette, State of Connecticut Commission on Aging, Professional for injunctive purposes, Angela Hanley, Family Relations Staff, Marylouise Schofield, Judge, Personally and in their professional capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L. Lee Whitnum
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
