Cases 41 - 50 of 586
Harris v. American Accounting Associatio
as 22-811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Harris and David G. Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
American Accounting Association, Lisa De Simone, Mathew Ege and others
Defendant:
Jian Zhou
Dai v. Garland
as 22-6131
Petitioner:
SU JUAN DAI and JIAN CE YE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maso Capital Investments v. E-House (China) Holdings
as 22-355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maso Capital Investments Limited, Altimeo Asset Management, Blackwell Partners LLC Series A and others
Defendant / Appellee:
E-House (China) Holdings Limited, Xin Zhou, Neil Nanpeng Shen and others
Grazioso et al v. Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan et al
as 1:2022cv01188
Defendant:
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda, The Taliban and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Grazioso, Lauren Grazioso, Briana Grazioso and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00725
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Foran v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Mark Foran
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alfred Poor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
