Cases 41 - 50 of 3,015
Globokar v. Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
William Globokar
Defendant:
Hess Corporation, James H. Quigley, Terrence J. Checki and others
LoPipero et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03250
Plaintiff:
Patrick LoPipero and Lisa LoPipero
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC, Philips Holding USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bell v. New York Legal Assistance Group et al
as 1:2024cv02434
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Bell
Defendant:
New York Legal Assistance Group, Lisa Rivera and Mr. Romo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schultz v. Weatherhunters, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02852
Plaintiff:
William Schultz
Defendant:
Weatherhunters, Inc., Al Roker Entertainment, Inc., Al Roker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Utter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02805
Plaintiff:
Lisa A Utter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gedney v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv06244
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Gedney
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
