Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Ouma v. Metzger
as 1:2013cv08719
Plaintiff:
Job Ouma
Defendant:
Andreas R. Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Schofield et al v. Manchester et al
as 3:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Schofield and Nancy Matthews
Defendant:
Town of Manchester , South Windsor Police Dept , Michael Magrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FUJIFILM North America Corp. v. H.A. Metzger, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00709
Petitioner:
FUJIFILM North America Corp.
Respondent:
H.A. Metzger, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Metzger v. Sebelius
as 6:2009cv06396
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Metzger
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Trustees of the Local 1034 I.B.T. Insurance Trust Fund et al v. Metzger Limousine, Inc
as 1:2007cv05248
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Local 1034 I.B.T. Insurance Trust Fund, The Local 1034 I.B.T. Pension Trust Fund and The Local 813 and Local 1034 Severance Trust Fund
Defendant:
Metzger Limousine, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Senorx, Inc. v. Coudert Brothers, L.L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv07820
Plaintiff:
Senorx, Inc., Senorx, Inc. and Senorx, Inc.
Defendant:
Coudert Brothers, L.L.P., Coudert Brothers, L.L.P., William K. Enger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
