Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Santoro v. USA
as 1:2015cv01004
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jason Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv05290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Aura Capital, Ltd. v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.
as 1:2015cv04951
Defendant:
Maria das Gracas Silva Foster, Jose Antonio de Figueiredo, Jose Miranda Formigli Filho and others
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 3.14 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.52 Acres in Franklin, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 76.-1-8.3 et al
as 3:2014cv02118
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 3.14 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.52 Acres in Franklin, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 76.-1-8.3, Angelo Santoro and All Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Santoro v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv01123
Plaintiff:
Julius S. Santoro
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Santoro v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc et al
as 7:2014cv05896
Plaintiff:
Jessica Santoro
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeter v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2014cv05995
Plaintiff:
Sharon Jeter
Defendant:
United States Of America, DOC, Administration: Fed Reserve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
