Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Rodriguez v. New York State Department of L
as 17-3634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Labor
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-3405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Kettely Laraque, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as a memeber of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as a member of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
TADCO Construction Corp. et al v. New York State Department of Labor et al
as 1:2017cv05718
Defendant:
Omar Benitez, New York State Department of Labor, John Padula and others
Plaintiff:
Frank DeMartino and TADCO Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, on behalf of the employees it represents, Kettely Laraque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, on behalf of the employees it represents, Kettely Laraque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
Strujan et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv05418
Defendant:
Zaza Aivazi, Appellate Division, Third Department, Paul Basuk and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Strujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aleksanian et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv04183
Plaintiff:
Levon Aleksanian, Jakir Hossain and New York Taxi Workers Alliance
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo, New York State Department of Labor and Roberta Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. New York State Department of Education et al
as 1:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
Wayne Smith
Defendant:
New York State Department of Education and New York State Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
