Cases 51 - 60 of 15,225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 1:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Eric J. Young, Michael H. Hurwitz and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HTOO v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv07514
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Ted H Kim, Director Ur M Jaddou and others
Plaintiff:
ARKAR HTOO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. Bridgeport Superior Court et al
as 3:2024cv01589
Defendant:
Bridgeport Superior Court and Margarita H. Moore
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Johnson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brigman et al v. Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv07419
Defendant:
Sandra L. Fenwick, Karen L. Daniel, Teladoc Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Brigman and David Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06921
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
