Cases 51 - 60 of 127
Georgy v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00656
Plaintiff:
MARY GEORGY
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hartofelis et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2018cv05642
Plaintiff:
Constantine M Hartofelis, Kelly Hartofelis and Constantine M. Hartofelis
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hartofelis et al v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks
as 1:2018cv05642
Plaintiff:
Constantine M Hartofelis and Kelly Hartofelis
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Marten v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2018cv09201
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Marten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Altman v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2018cv03411
Plaintiff:
Peter Altman
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gayle v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02119
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jullene Gayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Tseitlin v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2018cv01772
Plaintiff:
Ilana Tseitlin
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nayman v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv05816
Defendant:
Paula Boggs, Esq., Christopher C. Paci, Esq. and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Irwin Nayman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
