Cases 61 - 70 of 545,683
Ives v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Angela Ives
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shillen Mackall Seldon & Spicer v. The Hanover Insurance Group
as 2:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Shillen Mackall Seldon & Spicer
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
John v. Deml et al
as 2:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Discola John
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml and Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06373
Plaintiff:
Jacob Adam Dodd and May Dodd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Borcyk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06374
Plaintiff:
Laurie Borcyk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maragh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06375
Plaintiff:
Richard Oneil Maragh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06376
Plaintiff:
Na'tshun Chandler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Discola v. Deml
as 2:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
John Discola
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bazile v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bazile
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott, Donald Uhler, Mark Rockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
