Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Zepeda-Lopez v. Barr
as 19-145
Petitioner:
Carlos Alexander Zepeda-Lopez, Wuendy Yessenia Rodriguez-Cerda, Ansony Emmanuel Aguilar-Castro and others
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Singh v. Barr
as 19-139
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Manjit Singh
Chen v. Barr
as 19-107
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Qi Xuan Chen
Liu v. Barr
as 19-117
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xue Yong Liu
Fishman v. Barr
as 19-75
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Vadim Semenovich Fishman, AKA Kevin Sosa, AKA Michael Shapiro
Pastor v. Barr
as 19-77
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Natalio C. Pastor
Liu v. Barr
as 19-105
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jibin Liu
Garcia v. Barr
as 19-153
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eduardo Garcia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06031
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
