Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 113
Krasner et al v. Rahfco Funds LP et al
as 1:2011cv04092
Plaintiff: Steven Krasner , Alison Krasner , Michele Tellone and others
Defendant: Rahfco Funds LP, Rahfco Select, Rahfco Management Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Johnson v. Corrections Officer Truedo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2011cv00627
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Corrections Officer Truedo and Corrections Officer Haze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. The City of New York Police De
as 11-2164
Plaintiff: Ruthie Flemming, Wife, Power of Attorney
Plaintiff - Appellant: Woodrow Flemming
Defendant - Appellee: The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y., One Police Plaza, Police Commissioner, individually and his capacity as and employee of the City of New York as an agent 11/10/99., Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, the Capitol, individually and his capacIty as an employee of an agent for the City of New York City and Bronx County, New York 11/10/99. and others
Johnson v. Corrections Officer Truedo et al
as 1:2011cv00393
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Corrections Officer Truedo and Corrections Officer Haze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Combined World Trade Ce
as 11-1440
Plaintiff: Christopher Cirino, John Montalvo, Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Asmal, Kenneth Bertosen, Richard Biglin and others
Defendant - Appellee: Nacirema Industries Inc., New York City Department of Education, New York City School Construction Authority and others
In Re: World Trade Center
as 11-1218
Plaintiff: Christopher Cirino, John Montalvo, Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Asmal, Kenneth Bertosen, Richard Biglin and others
Defendant: Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers
Defendant - Appellee: Nacirema Industries Inc., New York City Department of Education, New York City School Construction Authority and others
Flemming v. The City of New York Police De
as 11-987
Plaintiff: Ruthie Flemming
Plaintiff - Appellant: Woodrow Flemming
Defendant - Appellee: The City of New York Police Department for Bronx N.Y., One Police Plaza, Police Commissioner, individually and his capacity as and employee of the City ofNew York as an agent 11/10/99., Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, the Capitol, individually and his capacIty as an employee of an agent for the City of new York City and Bronx County, New York 11/10/99. and others
In Re: World Trade Center
as 11-942
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: John Montalvo, Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Phyllis Costarella and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellee: Christopher Cirino
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
In Re: World Trade Center
as 11-1446
Plaintiff: Christopher Cirino, John Montalvo, Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sarah Atlas, Christopher Baumann, Ruben Berrios and others
Defendant: City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
Appellee: Noah H. Kushlefsky
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: New York City Department of Education
In Re: World Trade Center
as 11-1457
Plaintiff: Christopher Cirino, John Montalvo, Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sarah Atlas, Christopher Baumann, Ruben Berrios and others
Defendant: City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
Appellee: Noah H. Kushlefsky
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: New York City Department of Education

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?