Cases 71 - 80 of 258
White v. Rock
as 13-2251
Petitioner - Appellant:
John H. White
Respondent - Appellee:
David Rock, Superintendent of the Upstate Correctional Facility
Canty v. Rock
as 6:2013cv06232
Petitioner:
Moshe Cinque Canty
Respondent:
David Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Rock
as 9:2013cv00478
Petitioner:
Larry Porter
Respondent:
David Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Josey v. Rock
as 13-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derek Josey
Defendant - Appellee:
David Rock, Superintendent at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, P. Heath, First Deputy Superintendent at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, E. Russell, Assistant Deputy Superintendent of Programs at Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Shoga v. Rock
as 9:2013cv00464
Petitioner:
Alex R. Shoga
Respondent:
David Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Rock
as 13-1515
Petitioner:
DeAndre Williams
Respondent:
Supt. David Rock, Upstate Prison
Williams v. Rock
as 13-1515
Petitioner:
DeAndre Williams
Respondent:
Supt. David Rock, Upstate Prison
Tafari v. Rock
as 13-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
David Rock, Superintendent; sued in individual and official capacity, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent; sued in individual and official capacity, Gerald Otis, Deputy Superintendent; sued in individual and official capacity and others
Tafari v. Smith
as 13-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Keven Smith, Lt., R. Murphy, Cpt., David Rock, Supt. and others
Tafari v. Baker
as 13-1479
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, from 9:11-cv-1476, George Waterson, 9:11-cv-1429, Jason Ferrick, from 12-cv-662 and others
Appellee:
Richard Roy, from 9:12-cv-269, Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Thomas Quinn, from 9:11-cv-1390 and others
Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
