Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Bartoli et al v. APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01860
Defendant:
APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., Hospira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Debbie Acord, Martha Agudo, Emma Lou Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. Johnson et al
as 9:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ramos
Defendant:
J. Johnson, Dumas, G. Champage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renelique v. Holloway, et al
as 9:2001cv00601
Plaintiff:
Gary Renelique
Defendant:
Dep. Wilson , Supt. Sabourin , Nurse Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Valentino et al
as 6:2008cv06518
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Johnson
Defendant:
Joseph D. Valentino, Thomas R. Morse, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Seneca County et al
as 6:2008cv06459
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Johnson
Defendant:
Seneca County, The Seneca County Sheriff's Department, Leo T. Connolly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Brooks et al
as 6:2008cv06119
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Johnson
Defendant:
Maggie Brooks, Patrick M. O'Flynn, Ronald Harling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. New York County
as 1:2007cv07908
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Johnson
Defendant:
New York County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dentsply International, Inc. et al v. Discus Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00796
Plaintiff:
Dentsply International, Inc. and Tulsa Dental Products LLC
Defendant:
Discus Holdings, Inc., Discus Dental Corp., Lance J. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Johnson v. New York County
as 1:2007cv03164
Petitioner:
Albert J. Johnson
Respondent:
New York County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
