Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Galinsky v. United States Department of La
as 12-5133
Petitioner:
Boris Galinsky
Respondent:
United States Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board
Baiju v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 1:2012cv05610
Petitioner:
Bishnu S Baiju
Respondent:
Fifth Avenue Committee, Inc. and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
The Robert Plan Corporation et al
as 2:2012mc00608
Trustee:
Kenneth Kirschenbaum
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
In Re:
The Robert Plan Corporation
Debtor:
The Robert Plan of New York Corporation
Interested Party:
United States Department of Labor
Baiju v. United States Department of La
as 12-2424
Petitioner:
Bishnu S. Baiju
Respondent:
United States Department of Labor
Solis et al v. Serklan, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv04282
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Serklan, Inc. and Yong Hee Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03665
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Cambria Contracting, Inc. v. Soli
as 12-1685
Petitioner:
Cambria Contracting, Inc.
Respondent:
Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor
Cambria Contracting, Incorpora v. Soli
as 12-1599
Petitioner:
Cambria Contracting, Incorporated
Respondent:
Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor
Priests for Life v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2012cv00753
Defendant:
Timothy Geithner, Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda Solis and others
Plaintiff:
Priests for Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HILDA L. SOLIS Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor v. B&M Linen Corp.,
as 1:2012mc00040
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
B&M Linen Corp.
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
