Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 77 of 77
United States Of America v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00071
Plaintiff: the State of Indiana, the State of Georgia, the State of New Jersey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. and DEF
Intervenor Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Respondent: Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
Petitioner: Patrick A. Klingman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: MTBE Products Liability
as 10-4329
Plaintiff: Donna Berisha, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Steven C. Greene, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melanie J. Arcure, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: The City of New York, City of NY, The Water Board and others
Consolidated-Defendant: Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corporation and Total Oil, Inc.
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Flint Hills Resources, LP
Third-Party-Defendant: Northville Industries Corporation, John and Jane Does Nos. 1-500, John and Jane Does Nos. 501-1000 and others
Cross-Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-500
Cross-Claimant: Colorado Refining Company, Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Company, TPI Petroleum, Inc. and others
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corporation, BP Amoco Corporation, Chevron Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
In Re: MTBE Products Liability We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-4135
Plaintiff: Donna Berisha, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Steven C. Greene, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melanie J. Arcure, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: The City of New York and City of NY
Consolidated-Defendant: Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corporation and Total Oil, Inc.
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Flint Hills Resources, LP
Third-Party-Defendant: Northville Industries Corporation, John and Jane Does Nos. 1-500, John and Jane Does Nos. 501-1000 and others
Cross-Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-500
Defendant-Third-Party - Appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cross-Claimant: Colorado Refining Company, Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Company, TPI Petroleum, Inc. and others
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corporation, BP Amoco Corporation, Chevron Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: Mobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff: Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee: The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant: Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party: 21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America, ex rel. Joseph Piacentile v. Amgen Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv03983
Defendant: Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc., Amgen Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Relator: Kevin Kilcoyne, Joseph Piacentile and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff: All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant: Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant: El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff: Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant: Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant: A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant: Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant: The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor: United States
Not Classified By Court: Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?