Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Ventura Content, Ltd. v. Two Point OH, Ltd.
as 1:2011cv06674
Plaintiff:
Ventura Content, Ltd.
Defendant:
Two Point OH, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oh v. Choi et al
as 1:2011cv03764
Defendant:
Kyung Bok Choi, Soo Bok Choi, Sung Bok Choi and others
Plaintiff:
Oak-Jin Oh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pyatt v. Raymond, IV
as 11-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wadena Pyatt and Bang Hitz Publishing
Defendant - Appellee:
Usher Raymond, IV, AKA Usher, Alicia Augello Cook, AKA Alicia Keys, Krucial Keys, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02981
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Texis v. Quentin Market Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv05676
Defendant:
Sung Oh and Quentin Market Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cesar Texis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pyatt et al v. Raymond et al
as 1:2010cv08764
Plaintiff:
Wadena Pyatt and Bang Hitz Publishing
Defendant:
Usher Raymond, IV, Alicia Augello Cook, Krucial Keys, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oh et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03823
Defendant:
Detective Burell and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Junghi Oh and Wangyol Oh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fidelity Management Trust Company v. Kerner et al
as 1:2010cv03539
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Management Trust Company
Defendant:
Edith Frolic, Bernard Kerner, Joan Lebauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
