Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Doby v. Farag et al
as 1:2019cv06186
Defendant:
Wael S Farag and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon G Doby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brodsky v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jay Brodsky
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc. and Doe Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Bizounouya
as 1:2018cv12120
Respondent:
daourou bizounouya
Petitioner:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Brodsky v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11545
Plaintiff:
Jay Brodsky
Defendant:
Doe Defendants and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Peter Yi et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10709
Plaintiff:
Amy Yi and Peter Yi
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Rosario et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08045
Defendant:
Mariana Delgado, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Bassirou Sylla
Plaintiff:
Levie Mena and Alisha Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. Ramirez-Espinal et al
as 1:2018cv02804
Defendant:
Rasier-NY LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. and Luis O. Ramirez-Espinal
Plaintiff:
Wayne Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Camilo v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09508
Defendant:
Neun-NY, LLC, Dreist-NY, LLC, Acht-NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Camilo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds
Brooklyn Center for Independence for the Disabled v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al.
as 1:2017cv06399
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn Center for Independence for the Disabled , Taxis for All Campaign , Disabled In Action of Metropolitan New York and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Sarfraz Maredia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
