Cases 1 - 10 of 376
Swett Urquieta v. Bowe
as 1:2024cv01379
Petitioner:
Maria Elena Swett Urquieta
Respondent:
John Francis Bowe
Interested Party:
S.B.S.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Bowes et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09687
Plaintiff:
Jackie Bowes, Jackie Bowes As Guardian, On Behalf of Plaintiff Child L.S. and L.S.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Taino v. Bow Tie Cinemas, LLC
as 1:2023cv05371
Plaintiff:
Michael Taino
Defendant:
Bow Tie Cinemas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
Bowes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowes et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07080
Plaintiff:
Jackie Bowes and L.S.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Taino v. Bow Tie Cinemas, LLC
as 7:2023cv05370
Plaintiff:
Michael Taino
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Bow Tie Cinemas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-432
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
