Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
100 Bank, LLC v. BTC Mall Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Kim Ianelli, Caitlin Halpert, Bradley M. Biggie and others
Plaintiff:
100 Bank, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Domingue v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Bradley R. Domingue
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Henry v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Henry
Defendant:
Vermont Department of Corrections and Jeremy Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briere v. Agid
as 2:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Bradley M. Briere
Defendant:
Maureen P. Agid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. et al
as 5:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Richert
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and Bradley Maynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Tate v. C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Tate
Defendant:
C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HUB International Transportation Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ravlin et al
as 1:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
HUB International Transportation Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Lester Ravlin , Bryan Ravlin , Bradley Ravlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. Springfield Hospital et al
as 1:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
Arnold Bruce Robinson
Defendant:
Springfield Hospital, Darin W. Bradley, Richard A. Marasa and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
