Cases 1 - 10 of 19
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams
as 23-6983
Defendant:
ALAN ANDERSON, DESIREE ALLEN, SHANNON BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRENCE WILLIAMS and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Anderson
as 23-6178
Defendant:
ANTHONY ALLEN, DESIREE ALLEN, SHANNON BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, Sealed Defendant 2 and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Watson v. Searls et al
as 1:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas E. Feeley, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Bernier
as 19-459
Undetermined:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jean Bernier, AKA Charles Watson
Watson v. Koenigsmann et al
as 1:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Charles Watson
Defendant:
Koenigsmann, Stallone, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Annucci
as 9:2014cv00638
Petitioner:
Charles Watson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. United States of America
as 13-632
Petitioner:
Charles Watson, AKA Jean Bernier
Respondent:
United States of America
Watson v. Carver-Jordan
as 12-306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Watson
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Joyce Carver-Jordan, Former Director, Inmate Movement, Department of Correctional Services, Douglas Bostford, Director, Inmate Movement, Department of Correctional Services, R. Cunningham, Deputy Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
