Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lamothe v. Gallus et al
as 2:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamothe
Defendant:
Greg Gallus, Rutland Sheriffs Department and Rutland Superior Court Clerks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamothe v. Federal Court Clerks et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamothe
Defendant:
Federal Court Clerks and State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamothe v. Federal Court Clerks of Vermont et al
as 2:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamothe
Defendant:
Federal Court Clerks of Vermont and Vermont Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamothe v. Rutland Superior Court Clerks
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamothe
Defendant:
Rutland Superior Court Clerks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lamothe v. Federal Court Clerks
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamothe
Defendant:
Federal Court Clerks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Lamothe v. Federal Court Clerk
as 2:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamothe
Defendant:
Federal Court Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Grundstein v. Lamoille Superior Docket Entries/Orders et al
as 5:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Robert Grundstein
Defendant:
Lamoille Superior Docket Entries/Orders, Lamoille Superior Docket Entry/Order, Lamoille Superior Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguiar v. Carter et al
as 2:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aguiar
Defendant:
Richard Carter, Justin Couture, Jared Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Chief of Police et al
as 1:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Defendant:
Chief of Police, Hall, Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
