Cases 1 - 10 of 1,433
ORDONEZ VARGAS v. ORANGE COUNTY et al
as 1:2025cv00064
Defendant:
Dominick Piacente, ORANGE COUNTY, Harkins Patrick Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
MARISOL ORDONEZ VARGAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Lopez Castro)
as 24-3351
Defendant:
Sealed Defendant 1, Sealed Defendant 1, Cache and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Gomez Ortiz)
as 24-3343
Defendant:
Erito, ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, Coche Bomba and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Shojaeinia
as 24-3328
Defendant:
MOHSEN SHOJAEINIA and Sealed defendant 1
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Cardenas (Aguas Oviedo)
as 24-3299
Defendant:
Tonya, Tony, Maurice and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Mendez Feliz
as 24-3301
Defendant:
Sealed Defendant 1 and MARCOS ANTONIO MENDEZ FELIZ
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Diagostino (Cook)
as 24-3275
Defendant:
Sealed Defendant 2, JACOB COOK, Sealed Defendant 1 and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Carmona (Brend)
as 24-3264
Defendant:
MOSES VALDEZ, Sealed Defendant 6, JUAN ARELLANO and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bradley v. Charles
as 24-3257
Defendant:
BYRON KENNEDY, M.D., SANDRA CHARLES, APRN, DOE, Defendant; 1; oncall provider; Defendant; 2; Physician of record under whose License APRN Charles worked upon information and belief Byron Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
EARL BRADLEY
Government Employees Insurance Company, et al v. Bangiyev et al
as 1:2024cv08568
Defendant:
Michael Wesley Todd, D.C., ABA Chiropractic, P.C., Sacrum Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
