Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Suffolk County v. Corrado
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
SUFFOLK COUNTY, DIANE ZIELENSKI, NATALIE WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CORRADO
Suffolk County et al v. Corrado
as 2:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Suffolk County, Diane Zielenski, Natalie Wright and others
Defendant:
Christopher Corrado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Corrado v. Suffolk County, et al
as 2:2022cv04050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Corrado
Defendant:
Suffolk County, Diane Zielenski, Natalie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00925
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Leathersich v. Cohen
as 6:2018cv06363
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Leathersich
Defendant:
J. Dennis Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union NO. 28 Benefit Funds v. National Roofing Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv03835
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union NO. 28 Benefit Funds
Defendant:
National Roofing Corp. , Bruce Cohen and Dennis Cohen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ferrara et al v. National Roofing Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv01330
Plaintiff:
Louis Bisignano, Thomas F. Corbett, Anthony D'Aquila and others
Defendant:
Bruce Cohen, Dennis Cohen, NRC Construction Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. The Village of Airmont Planning Board et al
as 7:2007cv00473
Plaintiff:
Omnipoint Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
The Village of Airmont Planning Board, The Village of Airmont Planning Board, Dennis Cohen and others
Counter Claimant:
Kirk Budnick, The Village of Airmont Board of Trustees, Ian Smith and others
Counter Defendant:
Omnipoint Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
