Cases 1 - 10 of 374
United States of America v. Goodman (Evans)
as 24-1258
Defendant:
WILLIE EVANS, JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Riggin v. Fiorilli et al
as 9:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Chandler Joseph Riggin
Defendant:
Joanna Fiorilli, John Doe #1-5 and Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilgore v. Goodman
as 9:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Steven M. Kilgore
Respondent:
D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dove v. D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 9:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Defendant:
D.O.C.C.S., Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Greene Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke and D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWEIGERT v. GOODMAN et al
as 1:2024cv02203
Plaintiff:
D.G. Sweigert
Defendant:
Jason Goodman, 21st Century 3D, CROWDSOURCE THE TRUTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Smith v. Goodman
as 2:2024cv01353
Petitioner:
Jua Smith
Respondent:
Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Bergdorf Goodman LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Bergdorf Goodman LLC, T.J. Maxx, Inc., Marshalls of MA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Dohrman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Duane Dohrman, Donald McCain, Joanne McMahon and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
