Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Heine et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv04592
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
George Heine, Elizabeth Jackson, Nancy Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
United States of America v. Htut
as 24-661
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PHYO HEIN HTUT
Saproo v. Miromatrix Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10384
Plaintiff:
Christine Saproo
Defendant:
Miromatrix Medical Inc., Paul Buckman, William Burke and others
Dunton v. Hein et al
as 1:2023cv08792
Plaintiff:
Equanna Tashona Dunton
Defendant:
Charity Hein, Obsidian Lane Services LLC and Roger Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ryan v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv05111
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Thomas J. Sullivan, Joshua H. Levine and others
Stein v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04423
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Schallman v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04391
Plaintiff:
Nanci Schallman
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Mortman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04951
Plaintiff:
Frederick Mortman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Waterman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03341
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
