Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Curriere v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
Isabelle S Curriere
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tineo Gomez v. La Morena Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv06190
Defendant:
La Morena Restaurant Corp., Virgen Isabel Perez De Rodriguez and Ronald Rodriguez Perez
Plaintiff:
Andry Hilda Tineo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Peguero et al v. Neros Hacking LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05612
Defendant:
Joseph Anderson and Neros Hacking LLC
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Peguero and Alba Isabel De Peguero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Tenesaca-Sanango v. Garland
as 24-1963
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MARIA ISABEL TENESACA-SANANGO and WALTER DAMIAN CHUCHO-TENESACA
United States of America v. Prada (Gil)
as 24-1752
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FERNANDO GIL, HERNAN PRADA, JULIO CESAR ALVAREZ and others
Chicas-Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1374
Petitioner:
DENIA ISABEL CHICAS-MARTINEZ and CESIA MARIA VILLATORO-CHICAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vidal et al v. Isabel's Day Care Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03901
Plaintiff:
Ruth Vidal, Elizabeth Carias and Maria Morfin
Defendant:
Isabel Nino Rodriguez and Isabel's Day Care Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) FLSA: Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03837
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv03622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
