Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv01171
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Dannl P. Malloy, Scott Semple, Walter C. Bansley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00152
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Hartford Community Corr Ctr, Walter Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar Fletcher on behalf of the Estate of Deranna Fletcher v. ct department of corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Defendant:
ct department of corrections, Hartford Correctional Institute, Walter Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Fletcher on behalf of the Estate of Deranna Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
Darnell Walker
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Angel Quiros, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thunderhorse v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2015cv00375
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Jose Feliciano, William Faneuff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2014cv01648
Plaintiff:
Ryshon Wells
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Clayton and Ruggeri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reardon v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2014cv01292
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Reardon
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda and Joseph Haggan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herring v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv01231
Plaintiff:
Aaron Herring
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, James E. Dzurenda, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa v. Chapdelaine et al
as 3:2014cv01163
Petitioner:
Andres R. Sosa
Respondent:
Carol Chapdelaine and James E. Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan, Jr. v. Dzurenda, et al
as 3:2014cv00966
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Morgan, Jr.
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda , Scott S. Semple , Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
