Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Merritt v. Hicks et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 9:2023cv01465
Defendant:
John Doe C, J. Hicks, John Doe A and others
Plaintiff:
Elisha Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivy Coach, Inc. v. John Doe Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2023cv09730
Plaintiff:
Ivy Coach, Inc.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE d/b/a Best College Admission Consultants doing business as Best College Admission Consultants, JOHN DOE, Valerii Kafidov also known as Valerii Kafidoff doing business as Best College Admission Consultants and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) False representation of goods sold in interstate commerce
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Merritt v. Hicks
as 20-3522
Defendant / Appellee:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner Chief Medical Officer, J. Hicks, Sergeant, Governeur Correctional Facility, Dr. S. Ramineni, Mohawk Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
John Doe "E", Correctional Officer, Governeur Correctional Facility, Lieutenant Theriault, Acting Captain, Gouverneur Correctional Facility, John Doe "A", Correctional Officer, Governeur Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elijha Merritt
Merritt v. Theriault et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 9:2018cv01067
Defendant:
John Doe "E", John Doe "D", Nurse Jane Doe "A" and others
Plaintiff:
Elijha Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.