Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Shuler v. Liberty Consulting Services, Ltd.
as 1:2020cv05779
Plaintiff:
Kendell Shuler
Defendant:
Liberty Consulting Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. Bay Ridge Volvo-American, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kendell Garcia
Defendant:
Bay Ridge Honda, Inc. and Bay Ridge Volvo-American, Inc.
Perry v. Metro-North Railroad Company
as 7:2019cv02285
Defendant:
Metro-North Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Kendell Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv06608
Plaintiff:
Kendell Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jones v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01940
Defendant:
Correctional Capt. Viola Clifton, Correctional Officer Hamilton, CO John Doe #1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Kendell Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Brown et al
as 1:2014cv09725
Plaintiff:
Kendell Jackson
Defendant:
Lonnie Brown and Kyesha Fraser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Henry et al
as 1:2014cv09724
Plaintiff:
Kendell Jackson
Defendant:
Ray Henry, Luis Pichardo and Irving Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. Long Island Rail Road Company, et al
as 1:2014cv08263
Plaintiff:
Kendell Ward , James Reshard , John Courtard and others
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company and Transportation Communications Union
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Stevenson v. Ajesulas et al
as 1:2014cv03144
Defendant:
P.O. Oldson Ajesulas and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Kendelle Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Neat v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03109
Plaintiff:
Kendell Neat
Defendant:
City of New York and John/Jane Doe(s) #'s1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
