Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. Maldonado (Balbuena)
as 14-1645
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Ariel Capellan Maldonado, AKA Ariel, Jose Reynoso-Monegro, AKA Culito, Isidro Suarez, AKA El Diamante Negro, AKA Moreno and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Emmanuel Blanco Balbuena
United States of America v. Maldonado (Cluff)
as 14-1442
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Ariel Capellan Maldonado, AKA Ariel, Jose Reynoso-Monegro, AKA Culito, Isidro Suarez, AKA El Diamante Negro, AKA Moreno and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Xavier Cluff
United States of America v. Maldonado (Rodriguez)
as 14-1143
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Ariel Capellan Maldonado, AKA Ariel, Jose Reynoso-Monegro, AKA Culito, Isidro Suarez, AKA El Diamante Negro, AKA Moreno and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eddie Rodriguez, AKA Joel
United States of America v. Maldonado (Bonilla)
as 14-744
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Ariel Capellan Maldonado, AKA Ariel, Jose Reynoso-Monegro, AKA Culito, Isidro Suarez, AKA El Diamante Negro, AKA Moreno and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Cruz J. Bonilla, AKA Jay
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
International Tractor Co., Inc. v. Larry Harris Enterprise, Inc., et al
as 7:2008cv11370
Plaintiff:
International Tractor Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Larry Harris Enterprise, Inc.,, Larry Harris, Mike Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:1978cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pecial_master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
