Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dorsey v. Martuscello et al
as 7:2023cv09140
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Comm. Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Sullivan C.F. Warden, C.O. H. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Daniel Martecello, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Daniel Martecello, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, John Doe's, John Doe 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. LaVallee et al
as 9:2012cv01162
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Thomas E. LaVallee, Rick Rendle, Shawn Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Rachette
as 1:2012cv02057
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Steven E. Rachette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Brian Fischer, P. Chappius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. N.Y.S. et al
as 1:2011cv01097
Petitioner:
Leroy Dorsey
Respondent:
N.Y.S., Andrew Cuomo, Eric Schneiderman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorsey v. N.Y.S. et al
as 1:2011cv06136
Respondent:
10-21-11 Fat 5'9/11' Entire July 19, 2011 Officers Etc. and SHU, 5'5" J. Doe, 9 Nine Appointees Overseeing Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Leroy Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. Raccette
as 1:2011cv00789
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Steven E. Raccette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
