Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Horowitz v. Zucker et al
as 1:2018cv03312
Plaintiff:
Richard Horowitz
Defendant:
Howard Zucker , Keith W. Servis, Kendrick A. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04762
Defendant:
Detective Jeffrey Aust, James Doe and Mary Doe 1-10, Police Officers John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vessa v. City of White Plains
as 14-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank Vessa
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Mary Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Westchester County District Attorney's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of White Plains, City of White Plains Police Department, Detective Lieutenant Eric Fischer and others
Chen v. County of Suffolk
as 13-975
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Zhiwen Chen and Jihad Haddad
Defendant:
Police Officer Jim Doe, Police Officers John Doe and Police Officers Mary Doe, #1-10
Defendant - Appellant:
County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Police Officer Sean Wild and others
Vessa v. The City of White Plains et al
as 7:2012cv06989
Plaintiff:
Frank Vessa
Defendant:
The City of White Plains, The City of White Plains Police Department, Eric Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vessa v. The City of White Plains et al
as 1:2012cv06989
Plaintiff:
Frank Vessa
Defendant:
The City of White Plains , The City of White Plains Police Department , Eric Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United Central Bank v. Shree Ganesh Properties, LLC et al
as 7:2010cv08116
Plaintiff:
United Central Bank
Defendant:
Shree Ganesh Properties, LLC, "John Doe" #1-10, "Mary Doe" #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
