Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Torres v. Big Apple Contractors, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv05874
Defendant:
Big Apple Contractors,LLC, Mishael Sadykov and Big Apple Contractors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Manuel Torres
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Torres-Hernandez v. Sessions
as 18-862
Petitioner:
Manuel Torres-Hernandez
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
United States of America v. Magana
as 17-1165
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alcides Ramon Magana, Mario Ernesto Villanu Madrid, AKA Mario Villanueva Madrid, Jesus Albino Quintero Meraz, AKA Don Beto and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Victor Manuel Adan Carrasco
Teyer v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv05224
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jorge Manuel Torres Teyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Torres v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00809
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Torres
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Torres v. Colvin et al
as 3:2013cv00553
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Torres
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03819
Plaintiff:
Arthur F. Anderson, Lorain A. Anderson, Newton L. Ball and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Torres Teyer v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00340
Petitioner:
Jorge Manuel Torres Teyer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Apreza et al v. Amersino Marketing Group, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2007cv01140
Plaintiff:
Francisco Moreno Apreza, Francisco Moreno Apreza, Francisco Moreno Apreza and others
Defendant:
Amersino Marketing Group, L.L.C., Yu Wang and Chow Wa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
