Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ercole v. United States Department of Tr
as 11-1780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph R. Ercole
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray LaHood, Secretary of the Department of Transportation, AKA Mary E. Peters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dunleavy v. Peters
as 7:2008cv08720
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Dunleavy
Defendant:
Mary E. Peters
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
325 East 72nd Street Corp. et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2008cv01127
Plaintiff:
325 East 72nd Street Corp. and 315 East 72nd Street Owners Corp.
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Mary E. Peters, The Federal Transit Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. et al v. Peters et al
as 1:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc., Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc., Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mary E. Peters, The Federal Highway Administration and New York State Department of Transporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
