Cases 1 - 10 of 1,618
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mohamed v. Garland
as 24-1544
Petitioner:
ALI ABDOU MOHAMED
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04260
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sol NY Corp. v. Sams International Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03964
Plaintiff:
SOL NY CORP. d/b/a SOL TRADING CORPORATION
Defendant:
SAMS INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC A/K/A SIG DISTROA/K/A SIG DISTRIBUTION A/K/A SIG DISTRO WHOLSALE, FEEL GOOD INDUSTRY LLC, DIRECT IMPORTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BNP Paribas SA v. Kashef
as 24-1446
Petitioner:
BNP PARIBAS SA, a French corporation and BNP PARIBAS US WHOLESALE HOLDINGS, CORP., F.K.A BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Respondent:
ENTESAR OSMAN KASHEF, ABUBAKAR ABAKAR, ABBO AHMED ABAKAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
