Cases 1 - 10 of 2,918
KRAUS et al v. Northport VA Medical Center
as 2:2024cv03645
Plaintiff:
MR. DANIEL KRAUS and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Defendant:
Northport VA Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DANIEL v. Northport VA Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv03647
Plaintiff:
MR. KRAUS DANIEL
Defendant:
Northport VA Medical Center and U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kraus v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2024cv03648
Plaintiff:
MR. DANIEL KRAUS
Defendant:
Northport VA Medical Center and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KRAUS v. Northport VA Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv03649
Plaintiff:
MR. DANIEL KRAUS
Defendant:
Northport VA Medical Center and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Mugabo v. Wagner
as 24-1353
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTIN MUGABO
Defendant:
Ms. JOAN WAGNER, Mr. PETE and COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR EVERY1, (csevery1.com)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Anderson v. Gruntworks Meat Company LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mr. Luke Anderson
Defendant:
Gruntworks Meat Company LLC and Mr Victor Picone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fredricks v. Detective John Doe
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
NIGEL FREDRICKS
Defendant:
Detective MICHAEL ARDOLINO, Detective DERRICK RUSS, Detective MARK SCARLATELLI and others
Hango v. Eskew
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SAMUEL HANGO
Defendant:
DAVID ESKEW, DECHERT LLP, CARLYNE TURNER BEVERLY, Descher LLP Law Firm and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv03622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
