Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06603
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06313
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06281
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jeffreys v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company
as 22-3059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mr. Thomas J. Jeffreys
Defendant / Appellee:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Americans For Rali 2004 Q512 and Ocwen Loan and Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06474
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2298
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeffreys v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company et al
as 3:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas J. Jeffreys
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company and Ocwen Loan and Servicing, LLC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06340
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Isaac v. Premier Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv06814
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas Isaac and Thomas Isaac
Defendant:
Premier Motor Lines, Inc. and Angel L. Arnau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Chijioke v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Petitioner:
Remigius N. Chijioke
Respondent:
Mr. Garland, Mr. Alejandro Mayorkas, Mr. Thomas Feely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
