Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Fallon et al v. Greater Syracuse Moving & Storage Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Michael Fallon and Paula Fallon
Defendant:
Greater Syracuse Moving & Storage Co., Inc. and North American Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Torre v. Original Hall Lane Moving & Storage Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02348
Plaintiff:
Anthony Torre
Defendant:
Original Hall Lane Moving & Storage Co., Inc., North American Van Lines, Inc., Oakley Relocation LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wiggins et al v. Underhill et al
as 3:2013cv01368
Plaintiff:
Mark Wiggins and Richelle Wiggins
Defendant:
Glenn Underhill and North American Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
Scholastic Inc. and Dover Corporation
Defendant:
M/V Kitano, Nippon Yusen Kaisha , P&O Nedlloyd Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
Nippon Yusen Kaisha , Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie, GmbH and P&O Nedlloyd Ltd.
Cross_defendant:
General Carbon Corp.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
General Carbon Corp.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Rose Container Line, Inc. , North American Van Lines, Inc., Sirva Freight Forwarding, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Navtrans Intermodal Freight Forwarding Services Inc. and Navtrans International Freight Forwarding, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
General Carbon Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zuccaro v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
as 6:2007cv00551
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Zuccaro
Defendant:
North American Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
American Home Assurance Company v. El AL Israel Airlines et al
as 1:2007cv02883
Plaintiff:
American Home Assurance Company
Defendant:
El AL Israel Airlines and North American Van Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
