Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rodrigues Barbosa v. Garland et al
as 2:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Alexsandro Rodrigues Barbosa and Rodrigo Raposa Barbosa
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
New England Joint Board Unite Here et al v. Patriarch Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02079
Plaintiff:
New England Joint Board Unite Here , Kevin Galvin , Joseph Mello and others
Defendant:
Patriarch Partners, LLC and Patriarch Partners XIV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Powers v. Connolly et al
as 1:2013cv03042
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Powers
Defendant:
William J. Connolly, James Bell, Keith R. Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Fishkill Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv01370
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Powers
Defendant:
Fishkill Correctional Facility, William Connolly, James Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Fishkill Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv01286
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Powers
Defendant:
Fishkill Correctional Facility, William Connolly, James Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Fishkill Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv01096
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Powers
Defendant:
Fishkill Correctional Facility, William Connolly, James Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loadholt v. Doe
as 11-3621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Loadholt
Defendant:
John Doe, Doc Officer, OMH Staff, Medical Staff, Education Staff, Jane Doe, Doc Officer, OMH Staff, Medical Staff, Education Staff and Fishkill Correctional Facility
Defendant - Appellee:
K. Kurch, Correction Officer, C. Sherma, Correction Officer, Guarino, Sgt., Correction and others
Poquee v. Soto et al
as 1:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
Christopher Poquee, Christopher Poquee and Christopher Poquee
Defendant:
Samuel Soto, Jr., Thomas Raposa, Simon B. Croom, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
